S. Pankin
To Win
G. Lazarov
To Win
Semen Pankin vs Junior Tavarez Pichardo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W L L W L W
Form
L L L L W W L W W LHead To Head: Pankin 1 - 0 Pichardo
They have played 2 sets in total, with Pankin winning 2 and Pichardo winning 0. The last match between Pankin and Pichardo was at the M15 Tallahassee, 23-10-2023, Q1 round, I.hard with Semen Pankin getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Semen Pankin | 1 |
| Junior Tavarez Pichardo | 0 |
M15 Tallahassee(23-10-2023)
7
5
6
1
| Pankin | Stats | Pichardo |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (4-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 25 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 64% (47-26) | Career Total W/L | 32% (8-17) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Arnaldi VS Coric PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Semen Pankin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Semen Pankin
Player
Alec Beckley
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Florian Broska
Player
Semen Pankin
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Semen Pankin
Player
Lewie Lane
54%
(
61 of
114)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
106)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
62%
(
33 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
41 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
117
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 1-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Simone Agostini
Player
Semen Pankin
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
99
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Semen Pankin
74%
(
81 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
109)
7
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
54 of
76)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(2) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Semen Pankin
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Aleksandr Braynin
Player
Semen Pankin
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
62 of
105)
2
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
3
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-0 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Junior Tavarez Pichardo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Junior Tavarez Pichardo
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Victor Lilov
Player
Junior Tavarez Pichardo
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Tyler Stice
Player
Junior Tavarez Pichardo
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
80)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (47/26) | Win/Loss | 32% (8/17) |
| 63% (104/61) | Sets Win/Loss | 36% (19/34) |
| 55% (896/719) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (227/261) |
| 64% (16/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 68% (28/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 33% (7/14) |
| 43% (3/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 102 | Aces Total | 6 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 102 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 269.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 237.2 |
| 60% (1391/2314) | 1st Serve % | 49% (174/353) |
| 67% (932/1391) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (112/174) |
| 49% (455/923) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (73/179) |
| 45% (113/249) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
| 43% (963/2263) | Return Points Win % | 31% (87/284) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 64% (47/26) | Futures W/L | 33% (8/16) |
| 64% (46/72) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 32% (8/25) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 28% (5/18) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 44% (8/18) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 93% (46/43) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (10/8) |
| 7% (46/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (10/2) |
| 15% (27/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (15/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
